View all survey results here.

Comment Summary from 37 Survey Responders

1. Fiscal Responsibility and Spending

• Concerns Over Wasteful Spending: Many feel funds are being mismanaged, citing examples like administrative expansion, unnecessary curriculum directors, and frivolous purchases (e.g., credit card expenses, athletics costs).
• Call for Prioritization: Education, transportation, and class sizes should take precedence over athletics, administrative positions, and non-essential expenditures.
• Transparency Issues: Taxpayers demand clearer and more accessible financial reports to understand spending decisions. Suggestions include categorizing expenses and improving report clarity.

2. Leadership and Administration

• Criticism of Leadership: There are widespread calls for changes to the superintendent and BOE (Board of Education), with accusations of cronyism, lack of communication, and dismissiveness toward community concerns.
• Administrative Bloat: Respondents suggest cutting upper-level administrative positions and reallocating funds to student-focused priorities like transportation, teachers, and academic resources.
• Trust and Transparency: Leadership is urged to regain trust through better communication, transparency on decisions, and engagement with teachers and taxpayers.

3. Transportation Issues

• High Priority: The elimination of school busing is a significant concern. Many parents rely on transportation for their children, and its absence has caused financial strain, missed opportunities for extracurriculars, and logistical issues.
• Equity Concerns: Transporting sports teams while cutting busing for students to school is seen as unfair.

4. Academics Over Athletics

• Focus on Core Education: Athletics should be secondary, especially during financial crises. Some suggest shifting to a pay-to-play model for sports.
• Curriculum Concerns: Dissatisfaction with digital learning platforms and curriculum choices that lack teacher input. Calls to return to basics like textbooks, paper, and pencil.

5. Community Relations

• Communication Failures: Parents highlight poor or delayed communication on critical issues like bus route changes, staffing cuts, and board meetings.
• Engagement and Respect: Suggestions include reinstating community-focused events (e.g., “coffee chats”), establishing clearer channels for dialogue, and improving board meeting decorum.
• Fair Treatment: Calls for leadership to engage all community members respectfully, address socioeconomic factors, and avoid favoritism.

6. Solutions Proposed

• Cut Unused Assets: Sell underutilized properties, vehicles, and other district assets to raise funds.
• Administrative Cuts: Reduce administrative positions and associated costs.
• Grants and Fundraising: Seek alternative funding sources, including grants and private donations, for improvement projects.
• Transparency Policies: Create standardized protocols for communication, financial reporting, and decision-making to increase accountability.

Overall Sentiment

There is significant frustration with district leadership, perceived fiscal mismanagement, and the prioritization of athletics over academics and transportation. The community desires greater transparency, trust, and a back-to-basics approach focused on core educational needs and efficient spending.

---

Comment Summary from 15 Survey Responders

1. Support for Leadership: Many respondents express trust and appreciation for the district’s leadership, recognizing the challenges posed by state funding shortfalls and recent levy failures. They commend the administration for making difficult decisions under financial constraints.
2. Frustration with Survey Bias: Several commenters criticize a survey related to funding and cuts, calling it poorly designed, biased, and misleading. They argue it promotes a personal agenda and does not adequately represent the community’s views.
3. Community Division: Concerns are raised about a small group of vocal critics (often mentioned as specific community members) spreading misinformation, which some believe has contributed to levy failures and negativity toward the school district.
4. Call for Funding and Unity: Commenters highlight the importance of community support for schools, encouraging unity to pass levies and prioritize education over division.
5. Recognition of Good Work: While acknowledging day-to-day concerns, many commenters praise the school board, superintendent, and staff for doing their best. They request more focus on positive achievements rather than solely on cuts or problems.
6. Desire for Solutions: Some suggest the administration take stronger action to address misinformation and improve communication to rally community support for future levies.

Overall Sentiment

The feedback reflects broad support for school leadership, frustration with divisive actions and biased messaging, and a desire for renewed community focus on supporting education.

---

Parallels

1. Fiscal Mismanagement

• Both Groups’ Concerns:
  • Both taxpayers and parents/teachers feel district funds are being misused or poorly prioritized.
  • Examples: Spending on administrative bloat, frivolous purchases, and athletics is cited as evidence.
• Shared Desire: Redirect funds to critical needs such as transportation, classroom resources, and core education.

2. Leadership Accountability

• Both Groups’ Concerns:
  • Leadership (Superintendent and BOE) is viewed as disconnected, untrustworthy, or ineffective.
  • There is a shared frustration with lack of transparency and dismissiveness toward concerns.
• Shared Desire:
  • Leadership should engage the community, communicate decisions clearly, and demonstrate accountability for financial and operational decisions.

3. Transportation Cuts

• Both Groups’ Concerns:
  • Transportation elimination is a major issue that affects students and families.
  • Taxpayers feel their contributions should prioritize essential services, like school buses.
  • Parents emphasize the real-life impacts, such as families incurring financial burdens and logistical difficulties.
• Shared Desire: Bring back busing for students and ensure transportation remains a non-negotiable priority over athletics and non-essentials.

4. Athletics vs. Academics

• Both Groups’ Concerns:
  • There is dissatisfaction with the district’s prioritization of athletics over academics.
  • Taxpayers view athletic spending as excessive and unnecessary during financial strain.
  • Parents/teachers argue academics—class sizes, curriculum quality, and supplies—should come first.
• Shared Desire:
  • Athletics should be scaled back, potentially adopting a pay-to-play model, while academics are prioritized.

5. Trust and Transparency

• Both Groups’ Concerns:
  • Poor communication and decision-making have eroded trust in district leadership.
  • Taxpayers feel their money is being misused without explanation, and parents/teachers feel uninvolved in decisions that affect students.
• Shared Desire: Leadership must improve financial transparency and actively engage both groups when making decisions. Clear, detailed reporting and open communication are demanded.

6. Solutions-Oriented Feedback

• Both Groups’ Concerns:
  • While the frustration is evident, both groups offer practical solutions to address the district’s challenges.
  • Examples: Reducing administrative costs, selling unused assets, improving communication, seeking grants, and refocusing spending.
• Shared Desire: Concrete actions that prioritize students’ needs while respecting taxpayers’ investments.

Summary of Parallels

Both groups share a deep concern for fiscal responsibility, leadership accountability, and student-focused priorities. They converge on the belief that the district has misplaced its focus (e.g., athletics and administrative expansion) and must redirect resources to core education, transportation, and fair, transparent governance.