Milton-Union Schools Analysis

View the results from Survey 2.0.

View the proposal for strategic budget reallocation.

In the wake of our third failed school levy, what would enable us to come together as a district and support the changes that need to be implemented? I received 143 survey responses with permission to share the results. 3 out of 143 were not taxpayers within our district.

Over 75% of the survey responders have an annual household income of $50,000 or more.

I’ve grouped survey responses in the categories below along with a link to questions I have for administration moving forward.

AI summarized the feedback our survey responders wanted district leadership to know. To view all survey results, click here.

The responses reveal a deep division and mistrust within the Milton-Union community regarding school leadership, funding, and communication. Key themes include:

1. Communication and Transparency Issues:

  • Widespread frustration with lack of clear, consistent, and accessible communication about school finances, levy plans, and decision-making processes.
  • Calls for detailed, proactive outreach via multiple channels (social media, mail, in-person events) to engage all stakeholders, especially those without school-aged children.

2. Leadership Criticism:

  • Repeated dissatisfaction with the superintendent and the Board of Education, with many calling for resignations due to perceived failures in leadership and levy outcomes.
  • Allegations of arrogance, favoritism, and lack of accountability among administration and board members.

3. Financial Concerns and Priorities:

  • Strong criticism of spending decisions, such as purchasing land while cutting essential services like transportation.
  • Calls to focus resources on improving academics, mental health support, and equitable access for struggling students rather than extracurriculars or administrative costs.
  • Suggestions to sell unused assets, cut administrative salaries, and seek alternative funding solutions (e.g., property taxes, partnerships with local governments).

4. Community and Economic Struggles:

  • Many feel overburdened by taxes and unable to support additional levies due to rising living costs.
  • A divide between families with children in the district and those without, with the latter feeling detached from the school’s needs.

5. Impact of Cuts and Decisions:

  • Discontent over recent cuts to transportation, perceived misuse of funds, and the impact of these changes on students and families.
  • Concerns about teacher retention, classroom resources, and declining academic performance.

6. Desire for Positive Change:

  • Calls for a new vision, leadership, and approaches to rebuild trust, unite the community, and prioritize student success.
  • Emphasis on respecting community concerns and demonstrating fiscal responsibility.

Overall, the responses indicate a need for immediate action to address transparency, rebuild trust, and create a shared vision for the district’s future.